Learning Through Activism: Design of Alsancak National Freedom Park in Cyprus
Penned by Senem Zeybekoglu Sadri and Hossein Sadri, the article covers the design and development process of Alsancak National Freedom Park project in Northern part of Cyprus. The project has been developed with active participation of inhabitants and different stakeholders, generating an environmentally and socially responsive project vision as well as presenting an example for a high social impact of educational activities in a university.
The idea of Alsancak National Freedom Park project first emerged during the local elections in 2015, as a part of the election campaign of current mayor of Alsancak, Fırat Ataser, who was running for elections as an independent candidate at that time (Figure 1).
The site designated as the national park was a green area of 62 acres, under the control of Turkish military and it was located on the southern part of Karaoğlanoğlu Street, on the opposite of Karaoğlanoğlu Martyrdom. Since it was a military zone, it was closed to public access. During the election campaign, Fırat Ataser promised to make an agreement with the military, open the area to public and build a national park inside it (Figure 2).
The project which was proposed by the campaign team was intended to comprise of walking paths, an artificial pond, an open gym, a children's playground, a zoo and a restaurant (Figure 3-4).
After the elections, in October 2014, the municipality approached to Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hossein Sadri, the Dean of the Faculty of Architecture, Design and Fine Arts at Girne American University for collaboration during the process of the project. In November 2014, the first meeting was held with the participation of Dr. Senem Zeybekoğlu Sadri, Dr. Hossein Sadri and Hassina Nafa lecturers from the university, municipality technical team and representatives from the military (Figure 5).
Materials and Methods
The project carried a significant importance due to its potentials that it embodied. First of all, the project was first of its kind in North Cyprus, in terms of being conducted with a participatory manner from its very beginning. It was intended to differentiate from other projects which were determined behind closed doors through centralized and top-down approaches, with professionalism in their essence. The whole process of the project was designed to accommodate transparent, multi-disciplinary and direct democratic decision making processes and maintain cooperation among inhabitants and stakeholders at all stages of the project. Therefore, this project carried the potential of setting an example for future projects with its bottom-up approach and open, pluralistic and collaborative nature.
In addition to its methodology, the site and the content of the project was also unique for Northern Cyprus, and this provided a crucial potential for creating social awareness towards environmental protection. Reconsidering the hardly built “national park” understanding of the municipality which was presented by the election team during the election campaign, and transforming it into a more natural and ecological one was one of the key aspects of the proposed project. Preserving the natural characteristics of the park area and protecting it from over-construction; eliminating the use of concrete and plastic materials inside the park area; and imagining the park as a natural habitat not only for humans but for different species as well were some key ideas that emerged during idea development discussions.
Another important aspect of the project was opening up of a former military area to public use. The site was under the control of Turkish military since 1974, and the military has agreed to bring the park area into public service through a special agreement with Alsancak Municipality. This was also happening for the first time in Northern Cyprus, therefore the process of transformation of this military area into a public park constituted a very important experience for future potential applications.
Last but not least, the involvement of the university in such a project was very crucial in terms of strengthening the relations between the academia and the local community and beneficial for both sides. The university contributed the project with participation of academics and students, through conducting intensive research, presenting innovative ideas, moderating the project process, formulating the collected data and communicating the ideas and knowledge with the wider public. Correspondingly, this mutual relationship created a unique research and learning environment, and provided a hands-on experience for lecturers and students. Different stages of the project from site analysis, to meetings and workshops were laboratories where the students had the chance to meet a variety of dynamics that affect the design process; measure the impacts of different design proposals through discussing them publicly, and observe the impacts of their profession on environment and community. Additionally, public meetings, exhibitions and media coverage related to the project provided to reach to as many people as possible, making the process more instructive for the whole community.
Learning Through Activism
As an initial step for the project, GAU Faculty of Architecture presented to the municipality a road map to follow during the design and implementation of the project. This roadmap was a step by step guide, defining which activities can be organized at what stages, such as meetings, workshops, panels and exhibitions and how to include community within these activities in order to ensure that all decision making is conducted through collaborative and participatory processes.
Upon the agreement on the philosophy of the road map by the municipality, in December 2014 a workshop entitled “Freedom National Park Design Workshop” was organized by the municipality and the university collaboratively (Figure 6). Architecture students, lecturers from Girne American University (Senem Zeybekoğlu Sadri, Hossein Sadri, Alessandro Camiz, Hassina Nafa, Ziya Buluç, Fodei Conteh, Cem Yardımcı and Balkız Yapıcıoğlu) and architecture critic and designer Kenan Güvenç from Turkey attended the workshop as coordinators and designers.
The workshop started with a site observations and analysis session (Figure 7). After the site visit, participants were divided to the groups. There were 8 design teams comprising of lecturers and students, each of them focusing on a different issue.
At the end of the workshop, the below listed strategies were agreed upon by all groups as basic design criteria for the park (Figure 8):
1.Considering natural and ecological aspects of the park in all design decisions;
2.Designing walking paths inside the park by using natural materials so that human beings can be in contact with nature, without harming the existing eco-system and habitats of animals and plants (figure 9);
3.Building a small scale social facility on the periphery of the park, on an appropriate location for construction which had less green. A location meeting this criteria was north-east corner of the park, along the Karaoğlanoğlu Road;
4.Rather than plastic toys and children's playgrounds, providing natural materials and innovative play opportunities for children, where they can discover the environment, experience nature, create their own games, move freely, and learn through adventure (figure 10);
5.Using innovative and multi-functional park furniture made of natural materials.
6.Rather than a zoo, implementing preservation strategies in order to improve condition and variety of species (like endemic plants) in the park and provide a natural resting area for migratory birds.
7.Building a bird observatory tower in the center of the park.
After the workshop, all the work that was produced by students and lecturers has been exhibited in the Alsancak village square with the participation of Alsancak inhabitants (GAU Website). This interaction enabled students collect feedback about their design proposals from the local people (figure 11-13). Based on these design ideas and feedback, a conceptual master plan was drafted by Assoc. Prof. Dr. Senem Zeybekoğlu Sadri and Assoc. Prof. Dr. Hossein Sadri and presented to the municipality.
This draft master plan included decisions on directions, materials and construction techniques of pedestrian and bicycle paths inside the park; designing resting areas along the walking paths; greening strategies for paths inside the park which are being used by cars currently; location and design proposals for social facility building; location and design proposals for bird observatory tower; location, materials and construction techniques for car-parking areas around the park; and creating a natural amphitheatre for small scale gatherings (Figure 14).
Upon the presentation of the draft master plan to the municipality, a panel and workshop was organized to open the design proposal to public discussion. Inhabitants of Alsancak and Kyrenia, non-governmental organizations and professional chambers, representatives from local governments, members of Alsancak municipality council, and representatives of Turkish Republic Aid Committee were invited to the panel and workshop. This panel provided an opportunity for obtaining feedback from different stakeholders and finding a common ground that could meet the needs of as many sides as possible, without harming the natural ecosystem and wild habitat of the park. The draft master plan has been revised with the addition of these ideas deriving from the meeting, and the final version of the master plan in 1/2500 scale was approved by the municipality (Figure 15).
In the following step, detailed research, design development and visualization of proposals for walking and bicycle paths (figure 16), bird observatory tower (figure 17), resting areas (figure 18) and social facility building (figure 19-20) in smaller scale (1/200) were realized by Senem Zeybekoğlu Sadri and Hossein Sadri from the university in collaboration with Pembe Birinci, a local interior architect and urban designer. An environmental friendly and ecological design was aimed through protection of natural habitats and ecosystems by minimizing construction all around the park and restoring the existing vegetation inside the park; use of natural and local materials for all buildings and constructions; application of load-bearing techniques and passive-systems in buildings; and design of flexible and multi-use buildings and spaces.
The Alsancak National Park project, from its design process to the development of design proposals has been an instructive experience for North Cyprus in many ways. The transformation of a military area into a public park, the participatory process of decision making through the involvement of different stakeholders, and development of an ecologically responsive project at the end were important acquisitions that were obtained collectively. The process was also significant in terms of illustrating how activism and community participation can create common sense and as a result how it can change the environments that we all live in.
-http://www.newcyprusmagazine.com/november-launch-set-for-alsancak-national-park/, 10 February, 2017.
-http://architecture.gau.edu.tr/en/etkinlik/65/freedom_national_park_design_workshop_and_exhibition, 10 February, 2017.
-http://www.gau.edu.tr/en/haber/1024/largest_national_park_project_of_cyprus_workshop_by_gau , 10 February, 2017.
-https://www.alsancakbelediyesi.org/galeri/milli-park-projesi/ , 10 February 2017.
More concerned with the practical area than the theoretical area, preservation has the potential to touch the society a little more.
Civicwise, an international network working on civic design gathered together at Glocal Camp to discuss the community governance, collaborative economy, and inclusive communication
Hülya Ertaş talked to Florian Koehl on the social agenda of architects today and the alternative ways of realizing projects within the existing social and economical framework
What do we talk about when we talk about participatory architecture?
For the last five years, we have been witnessing an upheaval in participatory architecture practices in parallel with the prevailing social role of architecture